<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jacob Thurman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jacobthurman.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com</link>
	<description>Programming, Design, Business, and news from TwoDesk Software Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 01:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Castalia &#8220;Essentials&#8221; by Lachlan Gemmell</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/05/03/announcing-castalia-essentials/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan Gemmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 01:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=98#comment-920</guid>
		<description>This looks quite nice Jacob. As a happy ModelMaker Code Explorer user I&#039;ve never been able to justify the purchase of Castalia due to the overlap between the two products. At this price though I&#039;m definitely going to give this new feature set a try to see if it works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks quite nice Jacob. As a happy ModelMaker Code Explorer user I&#8217;ve never been able to justify the purchase of Castalia due to the overlap between the two products. At this price though I&#8217;m definitely going to give this new feature set a try to see if it works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking for some beta testers by Mervin Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/02/18/looking-for-some-beta-testers/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervin Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=93#comment-855</guid>
		<description>I develop software for Risk and Fraud Management for banks worldwide.  Using CodeCharge at the moment and have been looking at Castalia for a while.  Using D7 Pro and XE Ent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I develop software for Risk and Fraud Management for banks worldwide.  Using CodeCharge at the moment and have been looking at Castalia for a while.  Using D7 Pro and XE Ent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random thoughts on refactoring tools by Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/02/10/random-thoughts-on-refactoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=90#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Resharpers user interface for identifying code smells and recommended refactorings is way easier than the Delphi QA audits to use.  I&#039;d buy something like resharper for delphi like a shot if it behaved in the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resharpers user interface for identifying code smells and recommended refactorings is way easier than the Delphi QA audits to use.  I&#8217;d buy something like resharper for delphi like a shot if it behaved in the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random thoughts on refactoring tools by Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/02/10/random-thoughts-on-refactoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=90#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I’m used with Resharper that do have what you need (is C# and VB only). Also IntelliJ IDEA IDE have mostly the same features for Java:code smells, it suggest to you naming conventions on the fly.&quot;

Delphi QA Audits provide such static analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m used with Resharper that do have what you need (is C# and VB only). Also IntelliJ IDEA IDE have mostly the same features for Java:code smells, it suggest to you naming conventions on the fly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Delphi QA Audits provide such static analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random thoughts on refactoring tools by Ciprian Mustiata</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/02/10/random-thoughts-on-refactoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciprian Mustiata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=90#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m used with Resharper that do have what you need (is C# and VB only). Also IntelliJ IDEA IDE have mostly the same features for Java: code smells, it suggest to you naming conventions on the fly. I&#039;ve applied initially to around 1000 classes and shows simple yet somewhat easy to fix (it has like 300-400 false positives) around 6000 errors. 
In general most of refactors excluding &quot;extract method&quot; that is used as common sense to split your very long logic works very bad without static code analysis, are very hard to make easy. For example: you may need to make some methods static, or an expression will always give false, etc. and to delete specific branch of code. 
I do agree fully that in real life a refactor + a code analysis tool is priceless for high quality coding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m used with Resharper that do have what you need (is C# and VB only). Also IntelliJ IDEA IDE have mostly the same features for Java: code smells, it suggest to you naming conventions on the fly. I&#8217;ve applied initially to around 1000 classes and shows simple yet somewhat easy to fix (it has like 300-400 false positives) around 6000 errors.<br />
In general most of refactors excluding &#8220;extract method&#8221; that is used as common sense to split your very long logic works very bad without static code analysis, are very hard to make easy. For example: you may need to make some methods static, or an expression will always give false, etc. and to delete specific branch of code.<br />
I do agree fully that in real life a refactor + a code analysis tool is priceless for high quality coding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discoverability turns deadly by Jacob Thurman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random thoughts on refactoring tools</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2007/05/17/discoverability-turns-deadly/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Thurman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random thoughts on refactoring tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.twodesk.com/?p=3#comment-824</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems to be somehow related to the whole &#8220;discoverability&#8221; issue I wrote about here. I&#8217;m the creator of Castalia, a leading tool for Delphi programmers. Castalia can help you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems to be somehow related to the whole &#8220;discoverability&#8221; issue I wrote about here. I&#8217;m the creator of Castalia, a leading tool for Delphi programmers. Castalia can help you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;RTFM&#8221; by Jolyon Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/02/03/rtfm/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolyon Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=86#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t it just be &quot;tfm&quot; - .... &quot;Aha!  This is [the] TFM they keep telling me to R !!&quot; ...  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it just be &#8220;tfm&#8221; &#8211; &#8230;. &#8220;Aha!  This is [the] TFM they keep telling me to R !!&#8221; &#8230;  <img src='http://www.jacobthurman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New website and free programming books by Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/01/31/new-website-and-free-programming-books/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=84#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Arthur:
Castalia licenses can be purchased at http://www.twodesk.com/purchase.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur:<br />
Castalia licenses can be purchased at <a href="http://www.twodesk.com/purchase.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.twodesk.com/purchase.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New website and free programming books by Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2011/01/31/new-website-and-free-programming-books/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=84#comment-810</guid>
		<description>What about a Castalia licence ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a Castalia licence ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Castalia 2010.4.1 is now available by Jurij</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobthurman.com/2010/11/16/castalia-2010-4-1-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobthurman.com/?p=73#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Oh, at last! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, at last! <img src='http://www.jacobthurman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
